Why is Omniweb Just the Pokey Puppy of Browsers
Gerard Vanderleun
vanderleun at comcast.net
Mon Jan 2 16:26:38 PST 2006
On Jan 2, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Forrest Corbett wrote:
> Since upgrading myself from a dual 800/1.25GB to a dual 2.7/4.5GB, OW
> scales MUCH better.
That's good news. Only about $2000 between me and a faster browser.
But I take the main points about the functionality of the features made
by others in this thread. I think I was saying something like that in
my original post.
My sense is that the engine way down at the bottom of OW is the real
reason it pokes along. Can't keep dumping weight on an old car and
expect it to perform the same.
Gerard Van der Leun
http://americandigest.org
More information about the OmniWeb-l
mailing list