Why is Omniweb Just the Pokey Puppy of Browsers

Gerard Vanderleun vanderleun at comcast.net
Mon Jan 2 16:26:38 PST 2006


On Jan 2, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Forrest Corbett wrote:

> Since upgrading myself from a dual 800/1.25GB to a dual 2.7/4.5GB, OW 
> scales MUCH better.

That's good news. Only about $2000 between me and a faster browser.

But I take the main points about the functionality of the features made 
by others in this thread. I think I was saying something like that in 
my original post.

My sense is that the engine way down at the bottom of OW is the real 
reason it pokes along. Can't keep dumping weight on an old car and 
expect it to perform the same.

Gerard Van der Leun

http://americandigest.org


More information about the OmniWeb-l mailing list