Script grammar for "all rows which have named style x"

[Fraser Speirs]

On 7 Jan 2005, at 18:51, Timothy J.Wood wrote:

> - The terminology is vague.  "influenced" in this case means 
> "potentially has a visual effect, but maybe not".  For example, if the 
> named style has "font-fill=red" but the row itself has 
> "font-fill=blue", we'd still say 'influenced' is true in this case, 
> even though the row covers up all the stuff the named style defines.

The reason I'm asking this question is that I'm trying to commit a 
rather egregious abuse of named styles.  Specifically, I'm trying to 
use named styles with no attributes as a means of "tagging" rows with 
text without using a specific prefix in the topic string or note field. 
  Then I want to use AppleScript to find all the rows which have had 
these invisible styles applied.

So it's quite important to my plans that "influenced" doesn't just 
describe the visual appearance of a row, but all the styles that may be 
impacting a row, whether seen or unseen.

Fraser
-- 
Technical Coordinator  - ScotGrid
a: Room 481, Kelvin Building, University of Glasgow
w: http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/~fspeirs/    t: 0141 330 6439