Re(2): Back-to-Basic feature suggestions

[Jan M.J. Storms]

>On the other hand, if the end result is better (I don't have OO yet, because
>I don't have OSX yet, because I don't want to risk running More under it -
>catch 22 - so I'm not in a position to say whether OO is indeed better...)
>then I guess it will be worth my while to learn the new way.  It does feel
>like learning a Dvorak keyboard after a lifetime of Qwerty though - you have
>to slow down a lot for a long time to be able to speed up a little.
>
>Richard R

MORE runs in classic mode without a hitch.

As for the development of OmniOutliner: definitely match MORE. You can't
go wrong with that.

Beyond it, there are the obvious things missing in MORE, like scripting,
multiple columns, internet connectivity, paragraph and character level
style sheets, etc. 

Sincerely,

Jan M.J. Storms, M.A.

>---------------------------------------------------------------------<
                         STORMS W A T P
         scientific advice, training & process coaching
        Kempstraat 22rd, 2023 ES Haarlem, the Netherlands
                     tel. +31 (23) 529 91 61
        Web:  <http://storms.org/> - ePost <jan at storms.org>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------<