From brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu Tue Dec 18 08:14:38 2001 From: brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu (Brent Neal) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: List archives Message-ID: I just subscribed, and wanted to go back through the list archives. The link on the Mailman info page for the list seems to be broken. Has anyone else noticed this? B -- Brent Neal Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations Dept. of Physics - Dept. of Computer Science Louisiana State University From bertisonline at mac.com Tue Dec 18 11:12:22 2001 From: bertisonline at mac.com (Bertrand Grossier) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: OmniOutliner and More Message-ID: <29F94C3A-F3EB-11D5-B21B-000393014054@mac.com> What is missing from More(TM) into OmniOutliner? For me: -Text attached with a line (pressing Enter) -Dynamic settings (level 1 to n, font=blabla, etc.) and mostly: --Numeric lines (1, 1.1, 1.1.1, etc.) instead of only bullets --Space between levels --Break page -Header and Footer with dynamic elements: --Date --Page number, number of pages --Name of current level n --Filename (with no extension :-) That is good enough for a real use. What was missing from More(TM) 3.1? -Drag and drop capabilities -Waterprints options -Columns :-) I need OmniOutliner as a light and powerful documentation tool, with different outprints (native, pdf, html) generated at a single Save command at different places (on my hard disk (native file), into a mail (pdf for diffusion), online (html on a server)). I feel there are things that may be generic Services. I like the "make a tool with all the fun of Symantec's much-loved and missed MoreTM application for Mac OS, but we're going to be adding new features in later versions that no outliner has ever had" statement. I hope the best :-) Regards, Bertrand. From kc at omnigroup.com Tue Dec 18 11:52:20 2001 From: kc at omnigroup.com (Ken Case) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: List archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Tuesday, December 18, 2001, at 08:14 , Brent Neal wrote: > I just subscribed, and wanted to go back through the list archives. The > link on the Mailman info page for the list seems to be broken. Has > anyone else noticed this? Thanks for reporting the problem! As it happens, your message was the first to be posted to the list: before that, the link was broken because there was nothing archived; now that there is something archived, the link does seem to be working properly. Ken From dwaquilina at mac.com Tue Dec 18 12:05:54 2001 From: dwaquilina at mac.com (David Aquilina) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: OmniStuff (Was: Re: List archives) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Tuesday, December 18, 2001, at 02:52 PM, Ken Case wrote: > As it happens, your message was the first to be posted to the list: > before that, the link was broken because there was nothing archived That's kinda really funny :) As far as OmniOutliner is concerned, I was pondering one day, it'd be neat if OmniOutliner, OmniGraffle, and [Insert application that hasn't been created yet, a mid-weight word processor would fit in well, heavier than AppleWorks but lighter than Word[1]] were integrated decently well and made into a bundle, 'OmniProductive' or something like that. OmniWeb and OmniDict[2] would also fit in well too into this bundle. Just a random thought, as I have no idea how busy OmniGroup is with various things. -David [1] Hey, kinda reminds me of Gobe Productive :) [2] I've noticed a bug in OmniDict, it won't catch the Cmd-= keystroke the first time, only after its been started once through the Services menu. From brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu Wed Dec 19 08:33:29 2001 From: brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu (Brent Neal) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: OO Annoyance Message-ID: I think I submitted this as a bug/feature request some time ago, but I'm going to mention it anyway since I'm not sure. When OO is setup as a login item, it does not open previously open outlines. This is true if the OO application itself is in the Login items list and when I launch OO from an Applescript applet in the login items list. If I wait until the login process is completed and launch OO, it works fine. Brent -- Brent Neal Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations Dept. of Physics - Dept. of Computer Science Louisiana State University From brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu Wed Dec 19 08:50:04 2001 From: brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu (Brent Neal) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: OO Annoyance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: At 10:33 -0600 12/19/01, Brent Neal wrote: >I think I submitted this as a bug/feature request some time ago, but >I'm going to mention it anyway since I'm not sure. > >When OO is setup as a login item, it does not open previously open >outlines. This is true if the OO application itself is in the Login >items list and when I launch OO from an Applescript applet in the >login items list. If I wait until the login process is completed >and launch OO, it works fine. > A followup: I put a 2 minute(!) delay in the applescript, so that it would wait before launching OO. When this script was run from the Login Items, OO did not reopen my old outlines. When I double-clicked on it in the Finder, OO acted fine. Totally bizarre. B -- Brent Neal Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations Dept. of Physics - Dept. of Computer Science Louisiana State University From quinon at yhb.att.ne.jp Sun Dec 23 04:39:00 2001 From: quinon at yhb.att.ne.jp (Kino) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: OmniOutliner Help Message-ID: <3AE6F1FA-F7A2-11D5-8B3F-000502C86510@yhb.att.ne.jp> Hello Maybe I'm the only man who did not know it, but I just discovered: Looks good but is it normal to compress not only the folder but also all individual files? Yusuke Kinoshita From danb at 5280.com Sun Dec 23 16:37:59 2001 From: danb at 5280.com (Daniel Brogan) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: Feature request In-Reply-To: <200112232003.MAA11504@lists> Message-ID: Here's a feature that ought to be pretty simple, but also very useful: -- Select all Checked Items -Dan From khr at earthlink.net Sun Dec 23 20:52:01 2001 From: khr at earthlink.net (Robert Westmoreland) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: Feature request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: While we're at it, that's not very far from a feature I'd love to have: print all and only the checked items :-) -- Robert PS. Merry Christmas, all. > From: Daniel Brogan > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:59:33 -0700 > To: > Subject: Feature request > > Here's a feature that ought to be pretty simple, but also very useful: > > -- Select all Checked Items > > -Dan > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOutliner-Users mailing list > OmniOutliner-Users@omnigroup.com > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/omnioutliner-users From brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu Sun Dec 23 21:14:01 2001 From: brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu (Brent Neal) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: Feature request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: At 20:51 -0800 12/23/01, Robert Westmoreland wrote: >While we're at it, that's not very far from a feature I'd love to have: >print all and only the checked items :-) > >-- Robert > >PS. Merry Christmas, all. > > >> From: Daniel Brogan >> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:59:33 -0700 >> To: >> Subject: Feature request >> >> Here's a feature that ought to be pretty simple, but also very useful: >> >> -- Select all Checked Items >> > > -Dan > > If you have a Select Checked Items, all you need is Print Selected Items, which is much more generally useful. I'll toss my vote in for those two features, too. B -- Brent Neal Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations Dept. of Physics - Dept. of Computer Science Louisiana State University From khr at earthlink.net Sun Dec 23 21:50:59 2001 From: khr at earthlink.net (Robert Westmoreland) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: Feature request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: It's sort of embarrassing for someone with your academic credentials to second my suggestion. I really just want to print out my shopping list before I go to the store. -- R. > From: Brent Neal > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 23:08:08 -0600 > To: > Subject: Re: Feature request > > At 20:51 -0800 12/23/01, Robert Westmoreland wrote: >> While we're at it, that's not very far from a feature I'd love to have: >> print all and only the checked items :-) >> >> -- Robert >> >> PS. Merry Christmas, all. >> >> >>> From: Daniel Brogan >>> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:59:33 -0700 >>> To: >>> Subject: Feature request >>> >>> Here's a feature that ought to be pretty simple, but also very useful: >>> >>> -- Select all Checked Items >>> >>> -Dan >>> > > > If you have a Select Checked Items, all you need is Print Selected > Items, which is much more generally useful. I'll toss my vote in for > those two features, too. > > B > -- > Brent Neal > Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations > Dept. of Physics - Dept. of Computer Science > Louisiana State University > _______________________________________________ > OmniOutliner-Users mailing list > OmniOutliner-Users@omnigroup.com > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/omnioutliner-users From brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu Mon Dec 24 06:03:00 2001 From: brent at baton.phys.lsu.edu (Brent Neal) Date: Thu Nov 3 14:29:54 2005 Subject: Feature request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: At 21:50 -0800 12/23/01, Robert Westmoreland wrote: >It's sort of embarrassing for someone with your academic credentials to >second my suggestion. I really just want to print out my shopping list >before I go to the store. > >-- R. > *grin* I'm just a lowly graduate student, using OO for his dissertation.... B -- Brent Neal Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations Dept. of Physics - Dept. of Computer Science Louisiana State University