Virtually broken link problem
IACIOFANO Carmine
area at areasas.it
Mon Aug 18 16:59:19 PDT 2008
Dears,
during these summer holiday I went back to the village where I was
born and OmniGraffle has been chosen as the right instrument for it.
Then, after many try, I defined my style for it, very simple, made of
rounded rectangle for the people (with pink background for women and
light blue background for men), using a small circle as object for the
marriage/union as a conjunction for the lines starting from the joined
people and as a starter for the lines to go to each birth guy.
As a background, on a shared locked level, horizontal lines, one for
each year, so to also have an idea of the time relation.
Then, I started to populate the tree and I had vertical blocks for
each family (let's say that my mother and my father they both had many
brothers and sisters).
I also decided, as the simplest way for me, that any object will have
its vertical position, so to avoid a continuous rearranging of the
graph (I tried the automatic way of the automatic layout but when the
relation started to be complicated, the automatic layout was not so
able to keep the things in the right place). This was very simple to
do just selecting all the objects and arranging horizontally with a
fixed space
Now, the problem notes is the following: when I have to insert some
cousin and his/her children in the middle of one of the first trees of
family on the left, I created the new objects slightly on the right of
the related parent, then I made a "select all" and, finally an
"horizontal arranging with fixed space". At the end of this
rearrangement, some of the lines of uncle/aunt with many children
losed their connection with the related parent!
At the first, I noted that, selecting all the lines unlinked (they
remained with the same starting point, like if they remained linked to
a "virtual" parent) and starting to drag the origin, the lines
immediately re-joined the parent. When it started to become difficult
to look for each "virtually broken link" in the graph, I was luckily
noting a different way to re-join the "virtually broken link": when I
started to draw the graph I had the numbering of the years on the
left, only on the pair years (1870, 1872, 1874, ... till 2008) so that
I decided that my graph should start with an x=10 cm, leaving space
for the test of year numbers. Due to the fact that the horizontal
rearranging was also moving the relatives on the left, I had to
grouped all the objects and set the left offset to 10 cm, and then
ungrouping all the objects. This was magically re-join the "virtually
broken link".
It seems like that the horizontal rearranging was not able to force
the redraw of the window in the right way, in fact, if I save the
document and I close it, when I reopen it the link are correctly joined.
For Your info, consider that I created 2 drawing areas, one for my
side of relations and one for the side of relation of my wife, and
that my drawing area contains, now (it is still not finished) 76 man
objects, 73 woman objects, 44 marriage objects and 192 lines while my
wife's one is waiting for her help (I hope I will be back at home on
Wednesday evening). The document is quickly saved, without "include
preview" option, and it is arrived to grow, for the moment, to a size
1.4 MByte, without any problem of stability.
Let me know if You need I send You my file.
Carmine
Area s.a.s. di Carmine IACIOFANO & C.
Via Ronchella 9, 24020
Torre Boldone (BG) - Italy
Tel.: (+39) 035.19832001
Mobile: (+39) 335.5451056
More information about the OmniGraffle-Users
mailing list