OmniGraffle 5.0.1 beta 4 is now available

[Wim Lewis]

On Jun 19, 2008, at 7:59 PM, Corentin Cras-Méneur wrote:
> I've had a weird issue lately. One of my (large) documents mentioned  
> something about two pitures having the same ID and replaced one with  
> a duplicate of the other. I can only assume it is the same thing…
> I manually corrected the problem by re-pasting the picture that had  
> disappeared and everything has been fine ever since, but does it  
> mean the document actually *is* fine?? Is there anything I can do to  
> properly fix this document (or any other)??

IIRC, the bug causing duplicate *image* IDs was fixed in beta 3 (along  
with a separate bug that caused duplicate *graphic* IDs, but fixing  
that bug introduced the new bug in beta 3, which was fixed in beta 4).

In either case, manually fixing the incorrect image and re-saving  
should result in a consistent document; you don't need to worry about  
ongoing, lurking corruption.

As you've noticed, a "duplicate image IDs" warning probably means that  
some graphics contain the wrong images. A "duplicate graphic IDs"  
message might indicate that some line connections, labels, or actions  
are now referring to the wrong graphic. It might be completely  
harmless, though: all graphics have IDs (and any duplicate ID will  
cause the warning message) but most of the document's structure  
doesn't rely on graphic IDs.