OmniGraffle to Word X best way?
Adam Maxwell
amaxwell at wsu.edu
Sun Jan 18 20:22:30 PST 2004
On 18 Jan, 2004, at 20:12, John Oram wrote:
> I'd be curious to see if a) it's clear on screen for others, and b) it
> can be cleanly printed out (I won't have access to a printer until
> Tuesday).
Looks clear on screen, but I don't have a printer to test with.
[snip]
> This presumes that GC isn't actually turning it into a bitmap. Taking
> a close look at 500% magnification in Word, the image seems a tiny bit
> blurry, but still acceptable. If I zoom the PDF in Preview, no
> blurriness. If I zoom the PDF in GC, you can clearly see the
> pixellation at 2000%, and you get an identical result when you zoom
> the WMF in GC. It seems that GC's WMF export is a little lossy (or
> zoom is flaky?)
GC turns the PDF into a bitmap; I believe it's at 300 dpi. Your
comparison of the zoom in GC/Word and Preview shows this, too; what
you're getting with the WMF is a 300 dpi version of your original
vector image. The major advantage to using WMF with Word would be if
it gives a smaller file size than a TIFF or PNG.
rgds,
Adam
More information about the OmniGraffle-Users
mailing list