Experience with gradient fills in Graffle 1.2
Jeremy Reichman
jaharmi at mac.com
Tue Dec 18 13:37:03 PST 2001
Okay, I downloaded the sneakypeek version of Graffle (1.2 v1) and I'm
instantly seeing weirdness with the gradient fills. They are not working
as I expect them to, so I don't know if my expectations are in line with
what the program can do.
I will continue to try them out, but here is my initial report:
What I'm doing
--------------
I drag a rectangle from a palette into the drawing area. I fill it with a
color. I then turn on a linear gradient fill and change the angle. There
are a lot of bands on the screen, so I change from thousands to millions
in my display setup. (I'm running on an older PowerBook G3 Lombard/400,
and since I don't get any appreciable degree of video acceleration from
the stock ATI Rage Pro, I tend to run in fewer colors to speed up the
whole OS X experience.)
Since that doesn't seem to help the banding, I begin playing with the
Steps slider in the Info palette. (I don't think any of my other Classic
applications ask me about the number of steps in my gradients. Hm.)
I then go to the Color palette and slide the Opacity slider, to make my
object translucent. I drop a rounded corner rectangle behind my original
rectangle and then color the new shape. I want to be able to see it behind
my gradient-filled object, so I send the new object to the back with Send
to Back.
Finally, I switch the first rectangle's gradient from linear to radial.
What really happens
-------------------
The gradients are okay, but not quite what I'd expect, having seen other
graphics programs. Maybe I compare too much with Fireworks (which is after
all a much more expensive product), but that is now my baseline for any
sort of graphic program. I need to play with the number of steps to get
results I find appealing.
Between switching to millions and increasing the number of steps in the
gradient to 100, my machine is *much* slower in Graffle. There is
noticeable lag as I drag either rectangle around. I guess this is
explainable, but I wish it weren't the case.
The shadow definitely obscures the object behind a transparent object. To
really use transparency fully, I needed to turn off the shadow on the
topmost object. The Opacity slider does not appear to affect the
transparency of the shadow at all; nor could I find a way to do that.
(Actually, transparent shadows and natural/fading shadows would be on my
feature wishlist; they are something I really like about Macromedia
Fireworks and miss in Graffle.)
Switching the gradient from linear to radial ignored my transparency
settings; I was no longer able to see the backmost rectangle through the
topmost (gradient filled) one. The setting in the Color palette remained
at its previous mark (say, 10%) but it didn't look like it was being
honored.
What I expect
-------------
Please note that I'm not unhappy with Graffle when I list these
expectations. (Rather, I think I'm getting my money's worth already.) I'm
just listing what I, as a user, expect when I encounter an OS X program
that does gradient fills.
I expect that, being an OS X program, the gradient fills in Graffle will
blow me away with their utter coolness, the way most things in OS X do.
I expect that Graffle will remain as fast to use as it was before gradient
fills came along. I don't expect it to be really fast, since I have come
to expect very little speed from OS X. Still, running OS X is very
appealing, and it's even more appealing to have a cool native drawing
program ... rather than having to launch Classic all the time to run
something like Fireworks.
I expect that I'll be able to clearly see one rectangle behind the other
when I set the top one (gradient-filled) to be transparent -- no matter
what gradient type or shadow I use. I expect that I'll be able to switch
between different kinds of gradients without causing transparency and
other effects to be lost. I also expect that I'd be able to set the
transparency level of the shadow. Failing that, I'd like a shadow that
wouldn't obscure objects behind its object.
My environment
--------------
Below is an Apple System Profiler report describing my environment for
Graffle:
Report Created:12/18/2001 at 4:33:53 PM
Version of ASP that generated this report = 2.7
(note:this string only shows up in pre-final or debug versions)
Software overview
Serial number: Not applicable
Mac OS overview
System: Mac OS X 10.1.1 (5M28)
Note: No startup disk was selected.
Memory overview
Built-in memory: 384 MB
Number of empty RAM slots: 0 ()
Location Size Memory type
J3/BOTTOM 128 MB
J1/TOP 256 MB
Backside L2 cache: 1 MB
Hardware overview
Machine ID: 406
Model name: PowerBook G3 series
Keyboard type: PowerBook G3 series Keyboard with Inverted-T
Processor info: PowerPC G3 (3.0)
Machine speed: 400 MHz
Production information
ROM revision:
Boot ROM
version:
Serial number: -1-1
Software bundle: Not applicable
Sales order number: Not applicable
--
Jeremy Reichman
More information about the OmniGraffle-Users
mailing list