Most "universal" type of video file?
R.L. Grigg
newslists at autonomy.caltech.edu
Tue May 13 20:11:29 PDT 2008
On May 13, 2008, at 8:02 PM, Karl Kuehn wrote:
> On May 13, 2008, at 7:52 PM, R.L. Grigg wrote:
>
>>> I am split between MPEG 1, MPEG 4, and Flash, and here is why:
>
>> Wow. Interesting that MOV isn't on the list! If someone has iTunes
>> on Windows, what .mov encodings should play on their system? Or are
>> the two things not related.
>
>
> If someone has iTunes, then they have to have QuickTime, and so
> they can play most (or all?) .mov formats. But QuickTime/iTunes is
> not installed on the majority of windows computers, and is not
> available on linux computers. Therefore, if you are aiming for a
> "just works" experience, then it is not a recommended format.
>
> And QuickTime has been pushing MPEG 4 (and the H.264 variant) for a
> while now. So if you go with that format, you are getting the best
> general codec that QuickTime has (I a not saying that it can't be
> beat in specific arenas, but it is a good general contender).
Excellent! Thx so much for your insight.
Russ
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list