Apple announcement recap
David Cake
dave at difference.com.au
Wed Jan 16 21:01:47 PST 2008
At 2:39 PM +0900 16/1/08, David Cake wrote:
> I'm mentally translating this as 'most of the places where it
>will be difficult for me to work out where I am by sight, such as
>anywhere outside of a (US) dense city grid, it probably won't work
>very well'.
OK, so it works better than I thought it might.
But still - when I say ''most of the places where it will be
difficult for me to work out where I am by sight', you should bear in
mind I am moving to Alice Springs on Monday, which is in the middle
of a very big, very uninhabited desert, where I should think there
will be many times where I will be out of range of any Wi-Fi at all
(though there will be times when I am out of range of any Wi-Fi but
without range of a cell tower).
I think there is an issue here - the Skyhook stuff is always
going to be a little less powerful than GPS in ways like this, though
obviously cheaper as its software only. It would be great to have the
choice, but given the limited number of iPhone models now or likely
in the future, I'd say its almost certain that the Skyhook stuff will
generally be sufficient justification not to add GPS at all. Not
saying that this is bad for the phone in general (there are no doubt
design compromises beside price that mean the iPhone will gain in
some ways from not having GPS), but it will certainly be bad for some
people.
Cheers
David
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list