Leopard actual releasedate?

[Andrew Brown]

On 24 Sep 2007, at 13:18, Matt Johnston wrote:

> On 24 Sep 2007, at 07:51, Andrew Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not saying there weren't issues with some archaic fax  
>>> machines which seemed to be speaking a different protocol.
>>
>> Ah, so Tiger looks at the protocol of the fax it has received and  
>> saved to disk and says "I'll be damned if I forward that one!"?
>
> No, but translating from "ye olde facsimile protocol" to PDF is not  
> going to be an exact science when you've got hundreds of  
> manufacturers and a protocol over 100 years old.

You must be pretending to have difficulty with this issue. It does  
not matter if the fax machine is sending metal type or smoke signals  
down the wires, the problem has nothing to do with protocols old or  
new. Tiger receives the fax, converts it to pdf, saves it in the  
Faxes folder, and then just leaves it there, ignoring the fact that  
it should attach it to a mail and send it to me. Something is broken,  
and it's not the fax protocol.

> You see, that's just immature and more evidence of trolling. God  
> forbid you try and have some sort of debate with someone without  
> jumping between ridiculous extreme straw man arguments. [1] You  
> still beating your wife?

Your irony meter needs a bit of an overhaul.

AB