iTunes 7.4.1 and iToner

[Kevin Callahan]

On Sep 9, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:

>
> On Sep 9, 2007, at 4:02 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 9-Sep-2007, at 11:36, Kevin Callahan wrote:
>>> In the past, I've posted numerous "feature" requests in a similar  
>>> fashion and have gotten positive replies for suggestions.
>>>
>>> I didn't realize it was for APIs only.
>>
>> It's not, it's for any feature requests.  Shawn is projecting his  
>> opinion as fact, that's all.
>
> Sorry folks took what I said as black & white and I didn't help  
> that fact either.
>
> First I was replying purely in the context of "please let us make  
> ringtone for the iPhone".
>
> ...and the point I am trying to make is to use a little common  
> sense. Radar is primarily meant for developers to submit developer  
> related issues. It also is useful to submit product bugs and  
> feature requests. When you submit items someone from DTS must take  
> a little time to manage the item.
>
> I don't think it makes much sense to file about something that  
> obviously is a business decision and not a technical or "hey maybe  
> they didn't think of that feature". I don't think someone in DTS  
> needs to be bothered with this when the feedback pages also exist  
> and... obviously Apple knows that this would be a fun feature to  
> have... I mean they already have all the product features in place.  
> The only reason we don't have it is a business decision.
>
> -Shawn
>

so you are the one to decide on which feature requests or  
enhancements should go into the FEEDBACK column vs the RADAR's

Feature (new): Request for a new feature
Enhancement: Request for an enhancement to an existing feature.

I'll be sure to email you first, Shawn and get your approval.

Kevin