Stacks Are Worthless
Kevin Callahan
kcall at mac.com
Sat Oct 27 17:31:15 PDT 2007
On Oct 27, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Scott Anguish wrote:
> I think this depends entirely on your usage patterns.
>
> I use Stacks for accessing the downloads from Safari, but I don't
> keep the directory full.
>
> The other directories are also similarly small.. Applications, ~/,
> etc...
I have 324 items in my Documents folder (which is really an alias to a
folder living on an external drive) -
when I click the Documents icon in the Dock , nothing happens
obviously, not a good use for stacks
i'd like to put a SMART FOLDER there
but when I do, it opens in a Finder view instead of a grid or fan
(it's not because the smart folder contains 897 items)
when I create a smart folder with criteria that keeps about 5 items in
it, clicking on the smart folder in the Dock still opens the Finder
I don't mind too much, but I wouldn't mind eliminating the opening of
a window I don't need to open --
Anybody know how to create a sort column for date modified or date
created in a smart folder results window ?
I like having "Last opened", but why not the ability to add some
sorting options? Is there a way ?
K
>
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Phil Larson wrote:
>
>> So I'm liking most of Leopard, but Stacks are completely worthless.
>> I remember some people on here telling me they were for arbitrary
>> collections of files, which may be useful as a temporary
>> organization. Stacks are just a new and worse UI over the old
>> folders in a dock, just like I said and thought.
>
> Glad you came at it with an open mind.
> _______________________________________________
> MacOSX-talk mailing list
> MacOSX-talk at omnigroup.com
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list