Create Useless Archive

[Chad Leigh]

On May 12, 2007, at 6:20 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:

> On 9 May 2007, at 16:22, LuKreme wrote:
>
>>> Stuffit is innocent, by the way.
>>
>> No, it certainly is not, especially not version 7.
>
> Ok, Stuffit is no doubt almost universally guilty, voted for Bush  
> and would have voted for Blair and Berlusconi given half a chance.

Ignorant

> But in the case we were talking about, Stuffit was entirely  
> innocent: the zip, produced by the Apple utility, was corrupt, and  
> Stuffit said, when asked to unzip it, "this zip is corrupt".


How do you know it was corrupt?  Is the only indication that Stuffit  
said it was corrupt or do you have corroborating evidence from  
another utility?   If stuffit is the only one complaining it is  
corrupt, that leads back to the Stuffit being the problem.  Ie, y our  
logic is flawed.

Chad