pursuant partition thread
Chad Leigh
chad at objectwerks.com
Sun Mar 4 22:46:18 PST 2007
On Mar 4, 2007, at 5:16 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 3-Mar-2007, at 19:05, Ashley Aitken wrote:
>> The reason being that if you boot the same Mac from a DVD or
>> external drive that does not have the driver installed the OS will
>> only see 128GB of any larger partition.
>>
>> Inevitably this would royally screw up the partition. So I think
>> that's eminently professional advice and advice that I was willing
>> to follow to reduce the risk of data loss.
>
> Well, maybe. I did once accidentally put a 160GB drive onto a
> machine that only was capable of reading the first 128GB. I copied
> files to and from it (Large 30GB+ files, iMovie packages and such)
> and then moved it back to the machine that could read the full drive.
>
> No problem.
>
> YMMV and I wouldn't recommend it, but keep in mind, the machines we
> are talking about in this thread are not 'older' machines.
I put a 160GB drive in a machine that could only handle 128GB
drives. It was a new drive and I figured if I just formatted it at
120-128GB it would be OK. Turned out to not be OK. Files got
corrupted and it became a mess...
Chad
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list