Apple Windows apps?
Ashley Aitken
mrhatken at mac.com
Sat Jun 16 07:43:05 PDT 2007
On 16/06/2007, at 10:25 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
> On 16/06/07, Ashley Aitken <mrhatken at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 16/06/2007, at 9:53 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>>
>> > On 16/06/07, Ashley Aitken <mrhatken at mac.com> wrote:
>> >> If the right Core* bits have been ported then Cocoa (and/or
>> Carbon ?)
>> >> should work. Shouldn't it/they?
>> >
>> > In a word, no.
>>
>> Please elaborate. What am I missing?
>>
>> I thought Apple has been factoring out all the core stuff and then
>> Cocoa and Carbon were modified to work on top of them.
>> CoreFoundation, Core* ... (the necessary graphics and other parts of
>> the layer below the Application Frameworks).
>
> That's a gross oversimplification.
And that's not an elaboration.
> Also, it's patently obvious if you
> go look at Safari for Windows that it's not a Cocoa application.
I haven't run Safari on Windows but I have seen the screenshots on
apple.com.
How can you tell it's not a Cocoa app?
I don't think the obvious things (like the menu bar in the window)
preclude it from being a "Cocoa on Windows" app.
Remember, that's the whole idea of using layers - things underneath
can be implemented differently (i.e. using Windows libraries below).
So again, why are you so sure its not a Cocoa application? I'm not
sure it is, but I would like to know why you are so sure it isn't.
Cheers,
Ashley.
--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia
mrhatken at mac dot com
Skype Name: MrHatken (GMT + 8 Hours!)
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list