ZFS to become default file system in OS X?
Ashley Aitken
mrhatken at mac.com
Thu Jun 14 18:23:02 PDT 2007
Hi Scott (et al.),
On 15/06/2007, at 6:04 AM, Scott Anguish wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
>
>> One of the most obvious and immediate benefits is that ZFS supports
>> Time Machine much more robustly and efficiently then HFS+ can.
>
>
> This is a remarkable statement. What makes you think that??
I won't speak to robustness and efficiency (although I agree with
Shawn and Finlay) but I do know that ZFS pools would be a fantastic
plus for Time Machine.
Time Machine is currently limited to saving to one disk
(partition?). With ZFS you could pool many disks to make a much
larger (and expandable) Time Machine store.
I tend to fill up my disks, so trying to save an incremental backup
to a similar sized disk isn't going to be too effective (even if I
use the latest more expensive bigger drives).
Cheers,
Ashley.
--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia
mrhatken at mac dot com
Skype Name: MrHatken (GMT + 8 Hours!)
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list