ZFS to become default file system in OS X?

Ashley Aitken mrhatken at mac.com
Thu Jun 14 18:23:02 PDT 2007


Hi Scott (et al.),

On 15/06/2007, at 6:04 AM, Scott Anguish wrote:

>
> On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
>
>> One of the most obvious and immediate benefits is that ZFS supports
>> Time Machine much more robustly and efficiently then HFS+ can.
>
>
> This is a remarkable statement.  What makes you think that??

I won't speak to robustness and efficiency (although I agree with  
Shawn and Finlay) but I do know that ZFS pools would be a fantastic  
plus for Time Machine.

Time Machine is currently limited to saving to one disk  
(partition?).  With ZFS you could pool many disks to make a much  
larger (and expandable) Time Machine store.

I tend to fill up my disks, so trying to save an incremental backup  
to a similar sized disk isn't going to be too effective (even if I  
use the latest more expensive bigger drives).

Cheers,
Ashley.

--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia
mrhatken at mac dot com
Skype Name: MrHatken (GMT + 8 Hours!)





More information about the MacOSX-talk mailing list