ZFS to become default file system in OS X?
Matt Penna
matthew.penna at gmail.com
Wed Jun 6 13:20:16 PDT 2007
On Jun 6, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Kevin Callahan wrote:
> what might be some of the benefits a home network will see ?
>
In addition to the storage pooling mentioned so far (which is the
feature I'm most interested in personally), the ability to do
snapshots very easily should be a boon to Time Machine.
Variable block sizes for efficient storage of very small files also
promises benefits when storing many files that don't take up much
real space (like preference files, source code, etc.) but occupy 4K
on the disk regardless. This adds up very quickly.
There are a handful of other less obvious benefits. The Wikipedia
article is not super technical and is for the most part
understandable by "power users." (My mom wouldn't get it either,
Matt. :) )
There is the issue of case sensitivity. ZFS is a case-sensitive file
system which will simply not work (for practical reasons) on a
consumer-oriented OS. I believe there was work initiated in April to
allow ZFS to work in a case-preserved manner as HFS+ does by default.
I really hope this is true! I'm tired of dealing with 3 or 4 separate
hard disks in my systems. :P
Matt
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list