Apple acquires CUPS source
Matt Johnston
pelorus at mac.com
Thu Jul 12 10:48:55 PDT 2007
On 12 Jul 2007, at 18:21, Charlton Wilbur wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Matt Johnston wrote:
>
>>> As you say, since they own the code, they could have just as well
>>> relicensed it under the BSD, but then, they could not have
>>> _restricted_ the access as they do with their exception today.
>>
>> Why would they do that after buying it?
>
> Because then they can leave the parts that are currently free to
> remain free, and make lots of Linux distributions dependent on a
> printing subsystem that's Apple-owned and BSD-licensed, while not
> requiring improvements to be submitted to them but still
> benefitting from those improvements that were submitted.
I think they're much better off sticking it to the Linux politicos
who will now want to fork a GNU Printing Subsystem so they can rid
themselves of the taint of Apple code...
M
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list