Inkjet printers

[Scott Stevenson]

On Jul 11, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Hacker Scot wrote:

> A couple years ago we ditched our last inkjet and just share a  
> single b/w Brother laser in the house. When we want photo prints,  
> we let the pros do what they do best. At .15/print or whatever it  
> is, it's well worth it to not have an inkjet around to get pissed  
> off at. If you need immediate gratification, some services (like  
> snapfish) will let you upload images and have them available as  
> prints at your local Walgreens an hour later.
>
> If it were my mother-in-law, I'd be replacing her printer with an  
> inexpensive b/w laser, which will go for years without needing a  
> toner replacement.

I second that. Lasers are much cheaper than people remember, and  
you're not constantly futzing with ink. For photos, I let the  
services do it for the same reasons.

Other pluses with laser: sharpness, speed, and silence.

     - Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /mailman/archive/macosx-talk/attachments/20070711/a2d13140/attachment.html