Bill Gates on Vista and Apple's 'Lying' Ads (Mac OS X vs Vista)
Andy Lee
aglee at mac.com
Fri Feb 2 14:40:25 PST 2007
On Feb 2, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Matt Penna wrote:
>> BILL GATES: Well, certainly we've done a better job letting you
>> upgrade on the hardware than our competitors have done. You can
>> choose to buy a new machine, or you can choose to do an upgrade.
>
> Is the second statement even related to the first? Either it's
> simply an incomplete train of thought or he doesn't realize you can
> upgrade Mac OS X. Or Linux. Or anything else.
Sure, if your hardware is too weak for Vista you have the option of
upgrading the hardware or buying a new machine. He makes this sound
like flexibility. The option he leaves out is sticking with your
existing hardware, which for a lot of people won't be an option if
they upgrade if I understand correctly.
>> BILL GATES: So, yes, it took us longer, and they had what we were
>> doing, user interface-wise. Let’s be realistic, who came up with
>> [the] file, edit, view, help [menu bar]? Do you want to go back to
>> the original Mac and think about where those interface concepts
>> came from?
>
> I've read that a good 5 or 6 times and I still can't figure out
> exactly what he's trying to say. Perhaps I'm dense. Does anyone
> even care?
Who *did* invent the File/Edit/etc. menu convention? Obviously it
was burned into the Mac long before Windows existed. But did the
convention exist in Microsoft text-based programs before the Mac?
Did it exist at PARC? The problem is that an uninformed reader could
assume that Gates is saying Microsoft invented the convention and
Apple stole it from them.
--Andy
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list