rsync/incementral
Ashley Aitken
mrhatken at mac.com
Wed Aug 1 21:45:09 PDT 2007
On 02/08/2007, at 11:58 AM, rogerhoward at rogerroger.org wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 6:55 PM, steve harley wrote:
>
>> they whom i call Roger Howard wrote:
>>> Am going to begin testing on a much larger filesystem soon.
>>
>> it would be most excellent if you'd write us an update when the
>> test results are in
I used rsync (via RsyncX) for backing up 40GB with incremental
changes of a few GBs. It worked fine. I had 50 rotating incremental
backups on a networked machine.
I note that setting up the hard links for a very large number of file
takes time (the backups weren't the fastest) and space (particularly
because they are simulated on HFS+).
You may be better off with just standard incremental backups. I've
since moved to using just Backup for full and incremental backups to
an external Firewire drive (and that has its problems too).
Cheers,
Ashley.
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list