Five Reasons Why Apple's iPhone is Better Than the Rest

Adam Bridge abridge at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 18:21:46 PDT 2007


It's all a little premature, don't you think, since very few people
have actually held/used a working iPhone. All his evaluations involve
"reportedly".

The killer for me is: can I use it outside, is the display USEFUL in
sunlight? It just has to be bright enough outside for me to buy one.
I'm outside way too much. I'd rather have a gray-scale phone with a
fabulous monochrome display like the PowerBook 170 which was
completely useful outside. Sigh. We're all too darned fixed on
marginally useful color. And as for cameras....I could care less.

Adam Bridge


On 4/25/07, Kevin Callahan <kcall at mac.com> wrote:
> Paul Kedrosky submits: Having now wandered in the wilds of various
> cellphones over the last few months, I am re-reminded why Apple's
> (NasdaqGS: AAPL) iPhone is underestimated. I have a Palm (NasdaqGS:
> PALM) Treo 700, a Research in Motion (NasdaqGS: RIMM) Blackberry
> 8800, and a Samsung TV phone, and they all suck. Here are five things
> that bug me about the abovementioned trio, and that favor the iPhone:
>
> <http://biz.yahoo.com/seekingalpha/070425/33397_id.html?.v=1>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MacOSX-talk mailing list
> MacOSX-talk at omnigroup.com
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
>


More information about the MacOSX-talk mailing list