Adobe and Apple, is it all over
Cesar Alsina
alsina at mac.com
Sat Oct 7 19:12:55 PDT 2006
On Oct 6, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Roger Howard wrote:
> It's an
> entrenched app, and no matter how sexy, powerful, cheap, early and
> native
> an alternative comes out it won't replace Photoshop anywhere, and
> we all
> know it.
There was a time when same thing was thought about PageMaker. And
then Quark came in. And then, it came InDesign...
It's always possible for an app to be substituted. I'm not agreeing
at all with the article in discussion, but Photoshop, been as special
and wonderful as it is, is a little bit falling behind the times. I'd
like to see more revolutionary stuff in it at least in the way of
handling the way it manages layes and channels, and the awful amount
of power it needs to render stuff.
My point is that I'm open for whatever the market brings new... and I
don't think I'm alone, even for guys like me that have been using
Photoshop since version 1.
....
Cesar Alsina | GraphicBiz Corp. | We cover the whole world!
Graphic Design & Publishing
Web Architecture & Information Design
http://www.graphicbiz.biz : alsina at graphicbiz.biz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /mailman/archive/macosx-talk/attachments/20061007/58da5015/attachment.html
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list