Adobe and Apple, is it all over

Cesar Alsina alsina at mac.com
Sat Oct 7 19:12:55 PDT 2006


On Oct 6, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Roger Howard wrote:
> It's an
> entrenched app, and no matter how sexy, powerful, cheap, early and  
> native
> an alternative comes out it won't replace Photoshop anywhere, and  
> we all
> know it.

There was a time when same thing was thought about PageMaker. And  
then Quark came in. And then, it came InDesign...

It's always possible for an app to be substituted. I'm not agreeing  
at all with the article in discussion, but Photoshop, been as special  
and wonderful as it is, is a little bit falling behind the times. I'd  
like to see more revolutionary stuff in it at least in the way of  
handling the way it manages layes and channels, and the awful amount  
of power it needs to render stuff.

My point is that I'm open for whatever the market brings new... and I  
don't think I'm alone, even for guys like me that have been using  
Photoshop since version 1.



....
   Cesar Alsina | GraphicBiz Corp. | We cover the whole world!
   Graphic Design & Publishing
   Web Architecture & Information Design
   http://www.graphicbiz.biz  :  alsina at graphicbiz.biz


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /mailman/archive/macosx-talk/attachments/20061007/58da5015/attachment.html


More information about the MacOSX-talk mailing list