No VBA in Office
Matt Johnston
pelorus at mac.com
Wed Nov 22 12:21:39 PST 2006
On 22 Nov 2006, at 20:01, Roger Howard wrote
>>
>> Another classic example of our friends in the MacBU dumbing down
>> products for Mac users.
>
> And making plain that they are willing to alienate - no, screw - a
> significant number of users as long as they aren't the majority,
> expecting that the rest won't mind. So maybe they don't get any
> upgrade sales in corporate environments - with people either moving
> to Windows for Office, or sticking with 2004 under Rosetta, as I
> suspect I'll have to - which will further pinch the bottom line,
> and further justify less investment in the product.
So where to go from here?
Wait for Sheets/Tables/Cells from Apple?
OpenOffice?
Mesa?
I already have Mesa and it does the trick.
This Macros thing is going to be bad.
> And here I thought MacBU, and Office for Mac, was highly profitable.
Heck, they'll ship this product when it's ready. Not when it's
finished or complete....
> Guess what MacBU? Most features in most complex apps aren't used by
> all, or even most, users, but there's a network effect that allows
> these complex suite apps (whether MS, Adobe, Macromedia, or
> otherwise) to appeal to enough different users for enough different
> reasons that it creates a critical mass of customers, even though
> each of those customers comes to the table with very different
> requirements.
Hey, did you know you can use Excel AS A DATABASE!!!!
M
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list