Apple's 30" vs Dell's 30" monitor
Google Kreme
gkreme at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 02:24:03 PST 2006
On 13 Nov 2006, at 20:46 , Chad Leigh wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Scott Stevenson wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 2006, at 6:40 PM, Roland Torres wrote:
>>> Do the Dells have the ports on the BACK of the monitor, like the
>>> Cinemas? It seems so dumb to put them there. Can't think of a
>>> more remote location. You knock over almost everything on the
>>> desk just trying to plug something into it.
>>
>> I'd rather have all the visual clutter out of eyesight.
>
>
> I'd have to agree with Scott. It also allows for a place for the
> excess cord length to be put so you have less table clutter with
> extra cord hanging around, and I don't find it hard to use the
> ports. Granted, I plugged in some stuff and don't keep plugging
> and unplugging new stuff in the monitor(s). I use the USB port on
> the front of the computer for stuff I need to exchange a lot.
Yep, that is one drawback to the 2007FPW. the USB ports are n the
right, so there's a cable sticking out the right side of the screen.
It looks bad. Not just a little, even. I try to avoid using those
ports, but they are convenient for the stupid USB2 ipod.
Not the ipod, the USB2 is stupid. And slow.
--
Bishops move diagonally. That's why they often turn up where the
kings don't expect them to be.
More information about the MacOSX-talk
mailing list