Apple's 30" vs Dell's 30" monitor

Google Kreme gkreme at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 02:24:03 PST 2006


On 13 Nov 2006, at 20:46 , Chad Leigh wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Scott Stevenson wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 2006, at 6:40 PM, Roland Torres wrote:
>>> Do the Dells have the ports on the BACK of the monitor, like the  
>>> Cinemas? It seems so dumb to put them there. Can't think of a  
>>> more remote location. You knock over almost everything on the  
>>> desk just trying to plug something into it.
>>
>> I'd rather have all the visual clutter out of eyesight.
>
>
> I'd have to agree with Scott.  It also allows for a place for the  
> excess cord length to be put so you have less table clutter with  
> extra cord hanging around, and I don't find it hard to use the  
> ports.   Granted,  I plugged in some stuff and don't keep plugging  
> and unplugging new stuff in the monitor(s).  I use the USB port on  
> the front of the computer for stuff I need to exchange a lot.

Yep, that is one drawback to the 2007FPW.  the USB ports are n the  
right, so there's a cable sticking out the right side of the screen.   
It looks bad.  Not just a little, even.  I try to avoid using those  
ports, but they are convenient for the stupid USB2 ipod.

Not the ipod, the USB2 is stupid.  And slow.


-- 
Bishops move diagonally. That's why they often turn up where the  
kings don't expect them to be.



More information about the MacOSX-talk mailing list