Leopard Server hardware requirements?

Dennis Cox dcox at americanhotel.com
Fri Oct 5 07:41:29 PDT 2007


On 10/4/2007 6:56 PM, "John C. Welch" <jwelch at bynkii.com> wrote:

> On 10/04/2007 18:12 PM, "Nat!" <nat at mulle-kybernetik.com> wrote:
> 
>> P.S. I know, you aren't reading my mails very carefully.
>> Nevertheless, maybe check how I use the expression "arbitrary
>> hardware requirement" from the beginning and ponder how it differs
>> from just "hardware requirements".
> 
> Ah, arbitrary. Because of course, you get to define "arbitrary" however you
> like, which, from what we can all see, is "anything that inconveniences
> Nat". Of course, were apple to, just as arbitrarily mind you, set up
> hardware restrictions that did NOT inconvenience you, you would of course,
> have no problems with that.
> 
> This has nothing whatsoever to do with Apple being arbitrary, and everything
> to do with the potential of YOU being inconvenienced. The sweet, sweet
> hypocrisy of your argument and positions is like nectar to me.

That's okay, whenever he makes a word do a lot of work like that, he always
pay it extra.




More information about the MacOSX-admin mailing list