Parallels or VM Fusion
LuKreme
kremels at kreme.com
Sun Nov 4 00:07:28 PDT 2007
On 3-Nov-2007, at 23:09, Richard Peskin wrote:
> We're finally upgrading hardware here and need to select a Windows
> environment to run on the Intel based Macs. Which would be the
> preferred choice, Parallels or Fusion?
They are both really really really good and whichever you chose you
will likely be very happy with. Some people are vehement about one
over the other but I think that's a 'less filling' 'tastes great'
argument.
I've played with both, albeit briefly, and they were both so good I
was quite shocked.
I think if I wear purchasing I might lean a bit toward VMware but that
is likely colored by the fact I know someone who's working there now.
I do like that its integrated mode feels a little cleaner to me, but
really, it's a narrow distinction.
I believe both products offer demo versions, so try them out.
They are also both updated frequently, and new features and new fixes
are out at a rapid pace, so don't put much stock in any issues posted
on the Internet about either product that are more than a couple of
weeks old.
--
It's like looking for the farmers daughter in a haystack, and finding
the needle.
More information about the MacOSX-admin
mailing list